Xpensiv case study

Hivekind: before and after

We ran the Xpensiv design check on the public Hivekind page, rebuilt that page as a static copy, and fixed only what the check found. Same brand, same copy. Then we ran the check on the rebuilt page.

Original site: https://hivekind.com/. Rebuilt page: hivekind.xpensiv.si/after/.

Findings

BeforeAfter
VerdictNeeds attentionReview recommended
Findings3 (1 high, 2 medium, 0 low)2 (0 high, 1 medium, 1 low)
Check id9dc64c3d-b38d-463c-bae4-ee0f2994e33b72264166-0919-4893-a61e-6a0615469e73
Providerapproved-visionapproved-vision

Before

  • high: Mobile navigation hides primary links
  • medium: Service card cut off at viewport edge
  • medium: Text contrast is too low against its background

After

  • medium: Redundant Call-to-Action buttons in mobile view
  • low: Text contrast is too low against its background

Counts are the real results from the checks. The check is automated and can report new, smaller issues on a changed page, so the count alone does not tell the whole story.

Desktop (1440 wide)

Hivekind before, desktop
Before
Hivekind after, desktop
After

Mobile (390 wide)

Hivekind before, mobile
Before
Hivekind after, mobile
After

What changed